Forum talk:The Admin Meeting

All sounds good to me.

Rhysus2005 11:44, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

I have to agree with Rhysus, the change sounds pretty good and keeps things from getting too messy whilst also avoiding any problems. While a few articles might still end up needing deletion, I think it's probably better for the wiki in the long run with this rule, as it'll could lessen the amount needing deletion and/or encourage more people to get involved with the wiki. Not to say it doesn't have the potential to be misused, but I still think the revision to it works better. I think it pretty much covers everything and anything it doesn't cover is covered for by the other rules.

HaasGS 12:33, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. I'm going to be gone for a while, so I want to throw something else here:

I think that when we vote on something, we should require 4 favorable votes instead of 3. On top of discussing the rule change, I'd like to get your opinions on that.

-

Well, I think it makes sense, though it may require more discussion and working out of plans on a more dividing issue. The larger the majority vote, the better a lock something is for being done I think so four sounds good. Like I said, on a more complicated issue there may be more convincing and such required to get the full four votes, but even that is probably a positive since further communication and the like can likely produce better results. So, yeah, I think it's good, personally.

HaasGS 19:06, June 9, 2010 (UTC)